Crypto Hacks Tracker: Every Major Theft And Whether Customers Got Paid Back
Crypto gets stolen more often than most people realize. This tracker lists every reported hack and exploit we can find, updated daily, and adds the part that matters for your money: when an exchange, wallet or app was hacked, did its customers get paid back?
The Biggest Crypto Hacks
| Date | Victim | Type | Amount | How It Happened | Attacker | Customers Made Whole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 29, 2026 | Binance | Centralized exchange | $6.36B | Binance pledged to cover all losses from its SAFU fund and company funds. It said about 95% was covered as of Nov 1, 2026, and reopened withdrawals in phases from Nov 1. Most assets were back by Nov 8, 2026, with INJ, XPL, NEAR and LTC still awaiting security checks. Sources: fbi.gov, insurancejournal.com, thenationalnews.com, ambcrypto.com | North Korea's TraderTraitor group (attributed by the FBI, Oct 31, 2026; also TRM Labs) | Pending |
| Dec. 28, 2020 | LuBian | Mining pool | $3.5B | LuBian never publicly disclosed the theft or announced any repayment, and it disappeared in early 2021 after pleading on-chain for the coins' return. Sources: elliptic.co, info.arkm.com, cointelegraph.com | Unknown (disputed; Arkham and Elliptic trace the coins to wallets the US DOJ says Prince Group chairman Chen Zhi controlled) | No |
| Feb. 21, 2025 | Bybit | Centralized exchange | $1.5B | Bybit kept customer withdrawals open and replaced the roughly 400,000 stolen ETH within about 72 hours using its own funds and emergency liquidity from firms including Galaxy Digital, FalconX and Wintermute. Sources: ic3.gov, cnbc.com, bleepingcomputer.com | Lazarus Group / TraderTraitor (attributed by FBI) | Yes $42.9M recovered from the attacker |
| March 23, 2022 | Ronin Network (Sky Mavis / Axie Infinity) | Cross-chain bridge | $624M | Sky Mavis reimbursed affected users with its own funds and new venture money before reopening the bridge in June 2022. Sources: bloomberg.com, washingtonpost.com, cnbc.com | Lazarus Group (attributed by FBI) | Yes $30M recovered from the attacker |
| Aug. 10, 2021 | Poly Network | Cross-chain bridge | $611M | The attacker returned essentially all of the funds within about 15 days, and Poly Network restored users' assets. Sources: cnbc.com, theguardian.com, blog.chainalysis.com | Unknown (self-described white hat) | Yes $610M recovered from the attacker |
| Oct. 6, 2022 | BNB Chain Token Hub (Binance) | Cross-chain bridge | $570M | No user deposits were taken because the 2 million BNB was created from nothing, and validators halted the chain so the attacker could move only about $127M off it. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Not applicable |
| Jan. 26, 2018 | Coincheck | Centralized exchange | $534M | Coincheck repaid all of the roughly 260,000 affected customers in Japanese yen from its own capital. Sources: bloomberg.com, reuters.com | Unknown (Japanese prosecutors later charged dozens of people for trading the stolen NEM) | Yes |
| Feb. 7, 2014 | Mt. Gox | Centralized exchange | $470M | After a decade-long Japanese rehabilitation process, creditors began receiving partial repayment in BTC, BCH and yen in 2024 from the roughly 142,000 BTC the trustee still held. Sources: bloomberg.com, reuters.com | Alexey Bilyuchenko and Aleksandr Verner (charged by US DOJ in 2023); Alexander Vinnik accused of laundering the coins | Partial |
| Nov. 12, 2022 | FTX | Centralized exchange | $450M | The theft became part of the FTX bankruptcy, which repaid customers in cash at November 2022 prices plus interest rather than returning the crypto they held. Sources: reuters.com, bloomberg.com | Robert Powell, Carter Rohn and Emily Hernandez (charged by US DOJ in a SIM-swap case) | Partial |
| Sept. 24, 2026 | Bitget | Centralized exchange | $387M | Bitget said customer balances were not affected and the loss fell within its User Protection Fund, and it resumed withdrawals in phases starting Sept. 28. Sources: bitget.com, forklog.com, decrypt.co | Unknown (Bitget's CEO said early signs matched North Korean groups; no formal attribution) | Yes |
| Feb. 2, 2022 | Wormhole (Portal bridge) | Cross-chain bridge | $326M | Jump Crypto, Wormhole's backer, replaced the 120,000 ETH within about a day so wrapped ETH holders lost nothing. Sources: rekt.news, arstechnica.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Sept. 6, 2026 | Liquid Network (Blockstream / Liquid Federation) | Blockchain network | $320M | The attackers returned about 3,400 of roughly 4,000 BTC. By Nov. 2, 2026, Liquid's federation reserves matched the L-BTC in circulation (about 4,269 BTC each), according to Liquid's public reserves data, closing the roughly 600 BTC gap seen in mid-October. Our sources don't say how the remaining gap was covered. Sources: trmlabs.com, decrypt.co, cryptoslate.com, liquid.network | Unknown (self-described white hats) | Yes $272M recovered from the attacker |
| May 31, 2024 | DMM Bitcoin | Centralized exchange | $305M | DMM group companies supplied the money to back all customer bitcoin, and customer accounts were moved to SBI VC Trade before DMM Bitcoin closed. Sources: en.wikipedia.org, 2021-2025.state.gov | TraderTraitor / Lazarus Group (attributed by FBI, DC3 and Japan's National Police Agency) | Yes |
| April 1, 2026 | Drift Protocol | DeFi protocol | $295M | Users received recovery tokens worth $1 per dollar lost, redeemable from a pool funded by Drift revenue, up to $127.5M from Tether and up to $20M from partners, so full repayment depends on that pool growing. Sources: drift.trade, theblock.co, cointelegraph.com | DPRK-affiliated actor (attributed by Mandiant, per Drift) | Partial |
| April 18, 2026 | Kelp DAO (rsETH) | DeFi protocol | $293M | An Aave-led industry fund called DeFi United raised over $300M in ETH and, with ETH frozen on Arbitrum, refilled the stolen rsETH so holders could redeem again. Sources: theblock.co, coindesk.com, crowdfundinsider.com | Lazarus Group (suspected by LayerZero and on-chain investigators; Aave has called the link unproven in court) | Yes $71M recovered from the attacker |
| Feb. 9, 2024 | PlayDapp | Gaming project | $290M | No user deposits were drained, but the unauthorized minting diluted PLA holders and PlayDapp moved to a replacement token based on a pre-exploit snapshot. Sources: theblock.co, elliptic.co, web3isgoinggreat.com | Unknown (private key compromise suspected by PeckShield and Elliptic) | Not applicable |
| Sept. 29, 2020 | KuCoin | Centralized exchange | $281M | KuCoin said no user funds were lost because about 84% was recovered with partners and law enforcement and the company and its insurance fund covered the rest. Sources: bbc.com, reuters.com, reuters.com | Lazarus Group (attributed by Chainalysis and a UN expert panel) | Yes $235M recovered from the attacker |
| April 21, 2018 | Gate.io | Centralized exchange | $235M | Gate never disclosed the theft and appears to have absorbed the loss, with no reports of customer balances being cut. Sources: investing.com, oodaloop.com | North Korean hackers (attributed by on-chain investigator ZachXBT) | Yes |
| July 18, 2024 | WazirX | Centralized exchange | $235M | Under a Singapore court-approved restructuring, users got back about 85% of their balances in October 2025, with the rest in non-tradable recovery tokens. Sources: coindesk.com, therecord.media, 2021-2025.state.gov | Lazarus Group (attributed by blockchain analysts and a US-Japan-South Korea joint statement) | Partial |
| May 22, 2025 | Cetus | DeFi protocol | $223M | Sui validators froze about $162M, and after a community vote Cetus used those funds plus its treasury and a Sui Foundation loan to repay liquidity providers. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Yes $162M recovered from the attacker |
| Sept. 23, 2023 | Mixin Network | Blockchain network | $200M | Mixin said it would repay 50% of losses in USDT and issue debt tokens for the rest, to be bought back from future profits. Sources: reuters.com, theregister.com, rekt.news | Unknown | Partial |
| March 13, 2023 | Euler Finance | DeFi protocol | $197M | The attacker returned the stolen funds within about three weeks, and Euler distributed them back to depositors. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown (attacker returned funds) | Yes $240M recovered from the attacker |
| Dec. 4, 2021 | BitMart | Centralized exchange | $196M | BitMart pledged to cover losses from its own funds, but CNBC reported in January 2022 that some victims were still waiting to be repaid. Sources: rekt.news, cnbc.com | Unknown | Partial |
| Aug. 1, 2022 | Nomad | Cross-chain bridge | $190M | White hats and some exploiters returned roughly $37M, which Nomad paid back to users pro rata, so most users recovered only a fraction. Sources: rekt.news | Hundreds of copycat exploiters (largely unidentified) | Partial $37M recovered from the attacker |
| April 17, 2022 | Beanstalk | DeFi protocol | $181M | Beanstalk relaunched in August 2022 and gave depositors Unripe Bean and Unripe LP tokens that are paid down gradually from new protocol activity, not in cash. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Partial |
| Feb. 12, 2018 | BitGrail | Centralized exchange | $170M | A Florence court declared BitGrail bankrupt in 2019 and seized about $1 million of Firano's personal assets for creditors, far short of the losses. Sources: en.wikipedia.org, techcrunch.com, decrypt.co | Unknown (an Italian court held owner Francesco Firano liable, and Italian postal police later accused him of fraudulent bankruptcy) | Partial |
| Sept. 20, 2022 | Wintermute | Market maker | $160M | Wintermute absorbed the loss from its own equity and said its CeFi and OTC operations were not affected. Sources: rekt.news, forbes.com | Unknown | Not applicable |
| Nov. 9, 2017 | Parity Technologies (multisig wallet library) | Software wallet | $150M | The ETH remains permanently locked because the EIP-999 proposal to restore the wallet library was withdrawn. Sources: github.com, eips.ethereum.org | devops199 (accidental, per the user's own GitHub report to Parity) | No |
| Sept. 29, 2021 | Compound | DeFi protocol | $147M | No user deposits were lost because the bug paid out extra COMP from the protocol's reward reserve, and founder Robert Leshner asked recipients to return it. Sources: rekt.news | No attacker (a code bug in Proposal 62 overpaid COMP rewards, which Compound acknowledged) | Not applicable |
| Dec. 13, 2021 | Vulcan Forged | Gaming project | $140M | Vulcan Forged reimbursed the 96 affected wallets from its treasury. Sources: rekt.news, vice.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Oct. 30, 2021 | BXH | DeFi protocol | $139M | No full repayment to BXH users has been confirmed. Sources: forkast.news, halborn.com, kr-asia.com | Unknown (BXH blamed a leaked admin private key) | No |
| Oct. 27, 2021 | CREAM Finance | DeFi protocol | $130M | No repayment to depositors has been confirmed, and CREAM's offer of a 10% bounty for returning the funds produced no reported return. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | No |
| Nov. 3, 2025 | Balancer | DeFi protocol | $128M | About $28 million rescued by whitehats, Balancer and StakeWise is being returned pro rata to liquidity providers in the affected pools, and the rest is lost. Sources: decrypt.co, dlnews.com | Unknown | Partial $28M recovered from the attacker |
| Nov. 10, 2023 | Poloniex | Centralized exchange | $126M | Owner Justin Sun pledged that Poloniex would fully reimburse the stolen funds from company resources. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown (Lazarus Group suspected by on-chain analysts, not confirmed) | Yes |
| July 7, 2023 | Multichain | Cross-chain bridge | $126M | Multichain shut down days later and bridge users were not repaid. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown (Multichain said its CEO, detained by Chinese police since May 2023, held the signing keys) | No |
| Aug. 30, 2026 | Tectonic | DeFi protocol | $124M | A Cronos chain rollback restored about $111.2 million in balances, but about $9.19 million left the chain first and no repayment plan for that shortfall has been announced. Sources: theblock.co, rekt.news, cointelegraph.com | Unknown | Partial $111M recovered from the attacker |
| Dec. 2, 2021 | BadgerDAO | DeFi protocol | $120M | Badger's DAO approved a remediation plan that repaid affected users over time in vault tokens, not a single full cash refund. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Partial |
| July 31, 2026 | Coldcard (Coinkite) | Hardware wallet | $116M | Coinkite shipped patched firmware, but no compensation for drained users has been reported and seeds made on affected firmware must be replaced. Sources: trmlabs.com, bleepingcomputer.com, rekt.news | Unknown (TRM Labs says multiple attackers may be involved) | No |
| Oct. 11, 2022 | Mango Markets | DeFi protocol | $115M | Eisenberg returned about $67 million after a DAO vote, and Mango used it with treasury funds to repay depositors. Sources: rekt.news | Avraham Eisenberg (convicted by a jury in 2024, US DOJ; a judge later vacated the convictions) | Yes $67M recovered from the attacker |
| June 5, 2022 | Elrond (Maiar DEX), now MultiversX | DeFi protocol | $113M | Elrond said it recovered about 95% of the funds, burned the unbacked WEGLD and reopened the Maiar DEX two days later. Sources: romania-insider.com, cryptoslate.com | Unknown | Yes |
| April 20, 2025 | Bitget | Centralized exchange | $100M | Bitget rolled back the irregular trades and offered compensation from its protection fund to users who lost money in the window. Sources: theblock.co, rekt.news | Traders exploiting a malfunctioning market-making bot (Bitget said so and froze suspected accounts) | Yes |
| June 3, 2023 | Atomic Wallet | Software wallet | $100M | Atomic Wallet did not reimburse users and said fewer than 1% of its monthly users were affected. Sources: elliptic.co, rekt.news, fbi.gov | Lazarus Group (attributed by Elliptic, with the FBI later linking the funds to North Korea) | No $1M recovered from the attacker |
| June 23, 2022 | Harmony (Horizon Bridge) | Cross-chain bridge | $100M | Harmony dropped a plan to mint new ONE tokens for victims and proposed a treasury-funded recovery, but no full repayment has been confirmed. Sources: fbi.gov, theblock.co, rekt.news | Lazarus Group (attributed by FBI) | No |
| May 18, 2021 | Venus Protocol | DeFi protocol | $100M | Venus was left with about $100 million in bad debt, which it worked down over time rather than repaying lenders at once. Sources: theblock.co, thedefiant.io | Unknown (unidentified trader suspected of pumping XVS) | Partial |
| Aug. 19, 2021 | Liquid | Centralized exchange | $91.3M | Liquid covered the losses and took about $120 million in debt financing from FTX to keep customer balances whole. Sources: cnbc.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Oct. 8, 2021 | Mirror Protocol | DeFi protocol | $90M | The loss went unnoticed for seven months and no compensation was offered before Terra collapsed. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | No |
| Nov. 22, 2023 | HECO Chain bridge (HTX) | Cross-chain bridge | $86.6M | HTX pledged to fully cover losses from its same-day hot wallet hack, but compensation for HECO bridge users is not confirmed. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown (rekt.news said it bore the hallmarks of Lazarus Group, not confirmed) | Partial |
| Oct. 9, 2026 | Ledger devices sold by reseller CryptoBilis | Hardware wallet | $86M | Ledger told owners to move funds to a new device with a new recovery phrase, and no compensation from Ledger or the reseller has been reported. Amount is a floor: The Block and Decrypt report more than $86 million, unverified by Ledger. Sources: theblock.co, decrypt.co | Unknown | No |
| Jan. 23, 2025 | Phemex | Centralized exchange | $85M | Phemex said only hot wallets were hit and promised to compensate affected users. We found no confirmation that all losses were covered. Sources: rekt.news, halborn.com, bleepingcomputer.com | Lazarus Group (suspected by on-chain investigators, not officially confirmed) | Pending |
| June 18, 2025 | Nobitex | Centralized exchange | $82M | Nobitex pledged to cover users from its insurance fund and reserves and reopened withdrawals in phases, but no completed compensation has been confirmed. Sources: reuters.com, invezz.com | Predatory Sparrow / Gonjeshke Darande (claimed responsibility) | Pending |
| Dec. 31, 2023 | Orbit Bridge (Orbit Chain) | Cross-chain bridge | $81.7M | The bridge was shut down and holders of tokens backed by the drained vault were left without a repayment plan. Sources: rekt.news | Lazarus Group (suspected by on-chain investigators, not officially confirmed) | No |
| May 1, 2022 | Rari Capital (Fei Protocol / Tribe DAO) | DeFi protocol | $80M | Tribe DAO first voted to reimburse affected users, then reversed that decision in late 2022 and wound down. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | No |
| Jan. 28, 2022 | Qubit Finance | DeFi protocol | $80M | The attacker kept the funds despite a bounty offer and lenders on the platform were not repaid. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | No |
| Dec. 11, 2021 | AscendEX | Centralized exchange | $77M | AscendEX promised full reimbursement from company funds and later reopened withdrawals. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Yes |
| June 21, 2021 | StakeHound | DeFi protocol | $72M | StakeHound said the ETH was permanently inaccessible and pursued a lawsuit against Fireblocks instead of repaying token holders. Sources: theblock.co, coindesk.com | None (keys were lost, not stolen; StakeHound blamed custodian Fireblocks, which denies responsibility) | No |
| Aug. 2, 2016 | Bitfinex | Centralized exchange | $72M | Bitfinex cut every account by 36% and issued BFX IOU tokens, which it redeemed in full or converted into iFinex shares by April 2017, and the DOJ seized about 94,000 of the stolen BTC in February 2022. Sources: reuters.com, justice.gov, washingtonpost.com | Ilya Lichtenstein (pleaded guilty, US DOJ) | Yes $3.6B recovered from the attacker |
| April 1, 2025 | UPCX | Payment processor | $70M | The drained tokens came from the project's own management accounts rather than user balances. Sources: cointelegraph.com, cryptoslate.com | Unknown (flagged by security firm Cyvers) | Not applicable |
| Dec. 8, 2017 | NiceHash | Mining pool | $64M | NiceHash repaid the stolen bitcoin to users in monthly installments from its own profits over about three years. Sources: nicehash.com, justice.gov | North Korean military hackers / Lazarus Group (attributed by US DOJ indictment, February 2021) | Yes |
| March 26, 2024 | Munchables | Gaming project | $62.5M | The developer returned roughly $60.5M in ETH within a day, and the funds were secured in a multisig before being returned to users. Sources: rekt.news | Rogue developer hired by the team (identified by ZachXBT; North Korea link suspected, unconfirmed) | Yes $60.5M recovered from the attacker |
| July 30, 2023 | Curve Finance | DeFi protocol | $61.7M | White-hat bots and some of the attackers returned a large share of the funds, but not every affected pool was fully repaid. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown (some exploiters and white-hat bots returned funds) | Partial |
| July 26, 2023 | AlphaPo | Payment processor | $60M | The drained hot wallets belonged to the payment processor and its merchants, and AlphaPo never publicly detailed any losses to end users. Sources: theblock.co, decrypt.co, rekt.news | Lazarus Group (attributed by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, not confirmed by law enforcement) | Not applicable |
| Sept. 14, 2018 | Zaif (Tech Bureau) | Centralized exchange | $60M | Fisco invested 5 billion yen and took over the exchange, repaying BTC and BCH in kind and MonaCoin at a fixed rate, 60% in coin and 40% in yen. Sources: crowdfundinsider.com, cryptoglobe.com, cointelegraph.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Sept. 12, 2023 | CoinEx | Centralized exchange | $55M | CoinEx said the losses were a small part of its assets and covered them from company funds. Sources: rekt.news | Lazarus Group (linked by on-chain investigators through address overlap with the FBI-attributed Stake.com hack) | Yes |
| June 22, 2024 | BtcTurk | Centralized exchange | $54M | BtcTurk said cold wallets were safe and it absorbed the hot wallet losses from its own funds. Sources: cryptoslate.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Nov. 27, 2019 | Upbit | Centralized exchange | $49.3M | Upbit covered the full loss from its own funds and moved remaining hot wallet assets to cold storage. Sources: zdnet.com, ytn.co.kr | Lazarus Group and Andariel (attributed by South Korea's National Police Agency, November 2024) | Yes |
| Aug. 14, 2025 | BtcTurk | Centralized exchange | $48M | BtcTurk said user assets would not be affected because cold wallets were untouched and the company would absorb the hot wallet loss. Sources: cointelegraph.com, decrypt.co, cryptoslate.com | Unknown | Yes |
| July 19, 2025 | CoinDCX | Centralized exchange | $44.2M | The stolen funds came from the exchange's own operational wallet, and CoinDCX covered the loss from its treasury with no customer balances touched. Sources: decrypt.co, theblock.co | Unknown hackers who planted malware through a fake job offer (Bengaluru police arrested employee Rahul Agarwal, whose credentials were used) | Not applicable |
| Sept. 20, 2024 | BingX | Centralized exchange | $43.3M | BingX said most funds were in cold storage and that it would cover the hot wallet losses from its own reserves. Sources: rekt.news | Lazarus Group (suspected by blockchain security firm Cyvers, unconfirmed) | Yes |
| Sept. 9, 2025 | SwissBorg | Centralized exchange | $41.5M | SwissBorg said it would cover any shortfall for affected users from its own SOL treasury. Sources: rekt.news, protos.com, halborn.com | Unknown (gained access through staking partner Kiln's compromised API) | Yes |
| Nov. 2, 2026 | Mercado Bitcoin | Centralized exchange | $40M | Protocol Logic (DefiLlama classification). Customer outcome not yet researched. Sources: defillama.com | Not yet reviewed | Under review |
| May 7, 2019 | Binance | Centralized exchange | $40M | Binance covered the full loss from its SAFU emergency fund and resumed trading after about a week. Sources: cnbc.com, techcrunch.com, techcrunch.com | Unknown | Yes |
| March 25, 2019 | CoinBene | Centralized exchange | $40M | CoinBene called the outflows maintenance and denied a hack, and no repayment plan was ever announced. Sources: cointelegraph.com, elementus.io | Unknown | No |
| June 10, 2018 | Coinrail | Centralized exchange | $37.2M | Token issuers froze or burned roughly two-thirds of the stolen coins, but Coinrail did not announce a general payout for the rest. Sources: bleepingcomputer.com, techcrunch.com, medium.com | Unknown | Partial |
| Nov. 26, 2025 | Upbit | Centralized exchange | $36M | Upbit operator Dunamu said it would cover all customer losses from its own reserves. Sources: decrypt.co, cointelegraph.com | Lazarus Group (suspected by South Korean authorities, per Yonhap; not confirmed) | Yes |
| Feb. 12, 2022 | IRA Financial Trust (accounts held at Gemini) | Custodian | $36M | IRA Financial said it would use proceeds from its lawsuit against Gemini to reimburse customers, and the case settled in July 2024 on undisclosed terms. Sources: decrypt.co, cointelegraph.com | Unknown | Pending |
| Jan. 18, 2022 | Crypto.com | Centralized exchange | $33.7M | Crypto.com said it reimbursed all 483 affected users in full after unauthorized withdrawals bypassed two-factor authentication. Sources: rekt.news, fortune.com | Unknown | Yes |
| June 21, 2018 | Bithumb | Centralized exchange | $31M | Bithumb said it would make up the lost coins with the exchange's own holdings. Sources: koreatimes.co.kr, hacked.slowmist.io | Unknown | Yes |
| July 1, 2017 | Parity multisig wallet (Swarm City, Edgeless Casino and Aeternity wallets) | Software wallet | $30M | The stolen ETH sat in project token-sale wallets rather than retail accounts and was not returned, while white hat hackers moved about 377,000 ETH from other vulnerable wallets to safety and returned it. Sources: coindesk.com | Unknown | Not applicable |
| Nov. 1, 2022 | Deribit | Centralized exchange | $28M | Deribit covered the loss from company reserves and said client balances held in cold storage were not affected. Sources: rekt.news, hacked.slowmist.io | Unknown | Yes |
| July 12, 2019 | BitPoint Japan | Centralized exchange | $27.6M | BitPoint and its parent Remixpoint repaid customers' lost crypto before reopening the exchange. Sources: hacked.slowmist.io | Unknown | Yes |
| July 16, 2025 | BigONE | Centralized exchange | $27M | BigONE pledged full compensation from its internal reserves plus outside borrowing for some tokens. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Yes |
| Feb. 20, 2019 | Coinbin | Centralized exchange | $26M | Coinbin filed for bankruptcy after the embezzlement and no full repayment to customers was reported. Sources: hacked.slowmist.io | Coinbin employee, a former Youbit executive (alleged by the company) | No |
| Sept. 10, 2024 | Indodax | Centralized exchange | $25.2M | Indodax said user crypto and rupiah balances were fully safe and the company absorbed the loss. Sources: rekt.news, fxstreet.com | Lazarus Group (suspected by security firm Cyvers; unconfirmed) | Yes |
| April 14, 2023 | Bitrue | Centralized exchange | $23M | Bitrue said all identified affected users would be compensated in full and the drained wallet held under 5% of its reserves. Sources: coindesk.com, hacked.slowmist.io | Unknown | Yes |
| June 4, 2024 | Lykke | Centralized exchange | $22.4M | Lykke halted trading and announced a voluntary compensation scheme, but full repayment has not been confirmed. Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com, hacked.slowmist.io | Lazarus Group (suspected by on-chain investigators; unconfirmed) | Pending |
| Aug. 29, 2021 | Bilaxy | Centralized exchange | $21.7M | Bilaxy confirmed its hot wallet was hacked, and no record of customer repayment was found. Sources: hacked.slowmist.io | Unknown | Pending |
| Nov. 16, 2024 | DEXX | Trading tool | $21M | DEXX asked the hacker to return the funds and said compensation would depend on what it could recover, with no completed repayment reported. Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com | Unknown | Pending |
| Dec. 11, 2022 | 3Commas | Trading tool | $20M | 3Commas did not repay users, though FTX announced a one-time $6M payment for its own customers hit through leaked 3Commas keys shortly before FTX collapsed. Sources: blockworks.co, forklog.com | Unknown | No |
| March 29, 2019 | Bithumb | Centralized exchange | $19M | Bithumb said the stolen coins were company funds and customer assets in cold storage were not affected. Sources: hacked.slowmist.io, en.wikipedia.org | Suspected insiders (per Bithumb) | Not applicable |
| Oct. 21, 2026 | CoinDCX | Centralized exchange | $16M | CoinDCX said it credited all affected user deposits and absorbed the roughly $16M as an operational loss. Sources: protos.com, onebullex.com, cryptobriefing.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Jan. 14, 2019 | Cryptopia | Centralized exchange | $16M | Cryptopia went into liquidation, and liquidators began returning remaining BTC and DOGE to over 10,000 verified account holders in December 2024, with many receiving about 85% to 90% of their 2019 holdings. Sources: rnz.co.nz, en.wikipedia.org | Unknown | Partial |
| June 11, 2023 | Floating Point Group (FPG) | Custodian | $15M | FPG froze third-party accounts and halted trading, deposits and withdrawals, and no customer repayment was reported. Sources: coindesk.com, theblock.co | Unknown | Pending |
| April 29, 2024 | Rain | Centralized exchange | $14.8M | Rain said customer funds were safe and its parent Rain Group covered the losses. Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com, hacked.slowmist.io | North Korean state-sponsored hackers (attributed by the company) | Yes |
| July 24, 2025 | WOO X | Centralized exchange | $14M | WOO X compensated the nine affected users in full from its treasury. Sources: woox.io, cryptoslate.com | UNC4899, linked to Lazarus Group (attributed by the company's investigation) | Yes |
| April 8, 2023 | GDAC | Centralized exchange | $13.9M | GDAC halted deposits and withdrawals and reported the theft to South Korean police, and no customer repayment plan was confirmed. Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com, hacked.slowmist.io | Unknown | Pending |
| April 16, 2026 | Grinex | Centralized exchange | $13.7M | Grinex suspended operations after the theft and no repayment to users was reported. Sources: cointelegraph.com, thehackernews.com | Unknown (Grinex blamed Western intelligence agencies without evidence) | No |
| Oct. 31, 2024 | M2 | Centralized exchange | $13.7M | M2 said it took full responsibility for the losses and restored customer funds the same day. Sources: cointelegraph.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Nov. 22, 2023 | HTX (formerly Huobi) | Centralized exchange | $13.6M | Justin Sun said HTX would fully compensate the hot wallet losses, and services resumed within days. Sources: cointelegraph.com, cointelegraph.com, theblock.co | Unknown | Yes |
| Aug. 5, 2026 | KITE Foundation (Kite AI) | Other | $13.3M | The foundation froze transfers and migrated legitimate balances 1:1 to a new token contract from a pre-incident snapshot, excluding attacker addresses, and said no users lost assets. Sources: chaincatcher.com, techflowpost.com | Unknown | Not applicable |
| Sept. 7, 2023 | Fortress Trust | Custodian | $12M | Fortress covered most affected accounts and Ripple paid the rest within about a week as part of a planned acquisition it later dropped. Sources: fortune.com, theblock.co, coindesk-coindesk-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com | Unknown | Yes |
| May 8, 2025 | BitoPro | Centralized exchange | $11.5M | BitoPro said no user funds were affected and absorbed the loss itself, though it only acknowledged the hack 25 days later after ZachXBT flagged it. Sources: theblock.co | Lazarus Group (attributed by the company) | Yes |
| Dec. 21, 2020 | EXMO | Centralized exchange | $10.5M | EXMO said only its hot wallets were hit, about 5% of total assets, and promised to cover any user losses in full. Sources: cointelegraph.com, cointelegraph.com, theblock.co | Unknown | Yes |
| June 2, 2019 | Kraken | Centralized exchange | $10.4M | Access Control: Improper Access Control (DefiLlama classification). Customer outcome not yet researched. Sources: defillama.com | Not yet reviewed | Under review |
| July 29, 2014 | Cryptsy | Centralized exchange | $9.58M | Cryptsy collapsed in 2016, and victims got only small payouts from class-action settlements, including about $962,500 from Coinbase. Sources: theblock.co, cointelegraph.com | Paul Vernon, Cryptsy founder (alleged by court-appointed receiver and class-action plaintiffs) | Partial |
| June 6, 2019 | GateHub | Wallet provider | $9.5M | GateHub said it found no fault on its side and told affected users to move funds, and no reimbursement was announced. Sources: gatehub.net, theblock.co, cointelegraph.com | Unknown | No |
| Feb. 27, 2023 | MyAlgo | Software wallet | $9.2M | MyAlgo did not announce any reimbursement and told users to move funds out. Sources: cointelegraph.com | Unknown | No |
| Aug. 17, 2019 | CoinTiger | Centralized exchange | $9.2M | No public record was found of CoinTiger repaying holders, and the dumped tokens crashed PTT's price. | Unknown | No |
| June 19, 2011 | Mt. Gox | Centralized exchange | $8.75M | Mt. Gox rolled back trades made after the fraudulent sell order and restored balances before reopening. Sources: theregister.co.uk, en.wikipedia.org | Unknown | Yes |
| Dec. 25, 2025 | Trust Wallet | Software wallet | $8.5M | Trust Wallet pledged to reimburse affected users and began reviewing claims in late December 2025. Its July 17, 2026 update said claim reviews were still ongoing case by case. Sources: trustwallet.com, theblock.co | Unknown | Pending |
| Sept. 25, 2023 | HTX (formerly Huobi) | Centralized exchange | $8M | HTX covered the loss itself, and the hacker returned the 5,000 ETH on October 7, 2023, in exchange for a 250 ETH bounty. Sources: theblock.co, theblock.co | Unknown | Yes $8M recovered from the attacker |
| Aug. 9, 2026 | Coinsbuy | Payment processor | $7.9M | Coinsbuy said it covered all affected client funds from its own reserves and resumed normal service. Sources: cointelegraph.com, decrypt.co | Unknown | Yes |
| July 10, 2021 | Anyswap (later Multichain) | Cross-chain bridge | $7.9M | Anyswap said remedial action was in place for all exploited funds in its new V3 liquidity pools. Sources: rekt.news | Unknown | Yes |
| Jan. 6, 2024 | CoinsPaid | Payment processor | $7.5M | CoinsPaid did not comment publicly, and its clients are businesses such as merchants rather than individual savers. Sources: cointelegraph.com, beincrypto.com | Lazarus Group (suspected by Cyvers, unconfirmed) | Not applicable |
| Feb. 1, 2022 | Bitbns | Centralized exchange | $7.5M | Bitbns did not disclose the hack until 2023, and it is unclear whether user balances were fully honored. | Unknown | Partial |
| March 24, 2019 | DragonEx | Centralized exchange | $7M | DragonEx said it recovered part of the funds and would take responsibility for user losses, but later limited withdrawals through an internal quota token. Sources: cointelegraph.com, theblock.co, cointelegraph.com | Lazarus Group (attributed by on-chain investigators such as Chainalysis) | Partial |
| Aug. 18, 2020 | OKEx (now OKX) | Centralized exchange | $5.6M | The double-spend hit OKEx's own funds, and no customer losses were reported. Sources: cointelegraph.com, en.wikipedia.org | Unknown | Not applicable |
| Sept. 8, 2020 | Eterbase | Centralized exchange | $5.4M | Eterbase said it was taking steps to protect client deposits, but no repayment plan was found. Sources: theblock.co, cointelegraph.com | Unknown | No |
| Jan. 5, 2015 | Bitstamp | Centralized exchange | $5.2M | Bitstamp covered the loss from its reserves, most of which were in cold storage, and honored all customer balances when it reopened on January 9, 2015. Sources: fortune.com, cointelegraph.com, zdnet.com | Unknown | Yes |
| Sept. 24, 2026 | Magic Eden users (Limit Break Payment Processor) | Other | $1.8M | An attacker abused old token and NFT approvals to Limit Break's Payment Processor contract, used by Magic Eden's retired Ethereum-network marketplace. Whitehats moved another 23,155 exposed NFTs, worth over $5.7 million, to safe custody. Magic Eden said live listings weren't affected. Amount is DefiLlama's estimate. 660 WETH alone was worth about $1.77 million at the Sept. 24, 2026 price. Sources: theblock.co, decrypt.co | Unknown | No |
| May 1, 2026 | Bisq | Trading tool | $907K | A modified client exploited missing validation of negative miner fees in the Bisq 1 trade protocol to pull value from trade deposits. Volunteers advanced about 10.99 BTC and affected users were reimbursed on June 5, 2026, after a DAO vote. Bisq 2 and Bisq Easy weren't affected. Amount is 11.59104 BTC at the May 1, 2026 Coinbase close of $78,234. DefiLlama lists $550,000. Sources: bisq.network, bisq.network | Unknown | Yes |
| Dec. 30, 2020 | Guarda | Software wallet | Not disclosed | Attackers took over Guarda's web domains through its domain registrar and sent users to a fake wallet download page. Guarda offered refunds scaled to each user's loss, paying in full only for losses up to $2,000. No total loss was published. Source is ForkLog (secondary, quoting Guarda). Sources: forklog.com | Unknown | Partial |
| No incidents match these filters. | ||||||
Amounts are the US dollar value at the time of the theft, as reported by the victim, law enforcement or blockchain investigators. When sources disagree, we use the figure the victim confirmed and note the range.
Did Customers Get Their Money Back?
For every hack of a centralized exchange or wallet app of $5 million or more, plus the 60 largest incidents of any kind, we checked what happened to the people whose money was there:
- Yes: customers were made whole, either by the company covering the loss or through recovered funds.
- Partial: customers got some money back, often years later or in a different form, like company tokens or bankruptcy payouts.
- No: customers absorbed the loss.
- Pending: the company has pledged to cover losses or the case is still open.
- Not applicable: the funds belonged to a protocol or company treasury rather than customer accounts.
Did Customers Get Paid Back?
YesPartialNoPendingNot applicable
Centralized Exchanges: 61 hacks, 37 yes, 10 partial, 5 no, 6 pending, 3 not applicable. DeFi And Bridges: 29 hacks, 9 yes, 9 partial, 9 no, 2 not applicable. Wallets, custodians and other services (29 researched incidents) aren't shown. Source: Cult of Money research.
The pattern is clear. Large exchanges with large cash reserves usually cover customer losses, and they often say so within days. Smaller exchanges are more likely to freeze withdrawals, pay back partially or shut down. Mt. Gox customers waited about a decade for partial repayment, and FTX customers were repaid through bankruptcy rather than by the exchange itself.
A promise to cover losses is not the same as a payout. We mark a hack "yes" only once repayment has been confirmed by the company or by reporting, and we keep pledges marked "pending" until then.
How Crypto Gets Stolen
Share Of Dollars Lost
Share Of Incidents
1,347 incidents since 2011, worth $27.8 billion at the time of theft. Causes are grouped from DefiLlama's classifications. 60 incidents with no reported amount count toward incidents only. One incident, Binance's $6.36 billion theft on Oct. 29, 2026, is 23% of all dollars lost. DefiLlama files it under front-end and infrastructure attacks. Source: DefiLlama.
Stolen keys and front-end attacks account for most of the dollars lost, while bugs in smart contracts cause the most incidents. Here are the causes in plain English, from the most dollars lost to the least:
- Stolen keys. Attackers get hold of the private keys or signing systems that control a hot wallet. This is the largest cause by dollars and includes the Coincheck theft in January 2018 and the Ronin Network theft in March 2022.
- Front-end and infrastructure attacks. Attackers break into a company's servers, internal systems or website instead of its smart contracts. Sometimes a website or domain is hijacked, so users approve transactions that send their own funds to the attacker. This is the second-largest cause by dollars because DefiLlama files Binance's $6.36 billion theft in October 2026 here. Without that one theft, it would be one of the smaller causes.
- Social engineering. Attackers trick employees or wallet signers into approving a transaction or handing over access. DefiLlama files the Bybit theft in February 2025 here, after signers approved a transaction that gave the attackers control of the wallet. We use the FBI's figure of $1.5 billion, as the table does, while the cause chart uses DefiLlama's $1.4 billion.
- Bugs in smart contracts. Code that holds money does something its authors didn't intend. Attackers find the flaw and drain it, sometimes in minutes.
- Access control failures. Someone gains admin powers they should not have, often through a compromised employee account or a badly configured contract.
- Bridge exploits. Attackers fool the systems that move tokens between blockchains into releasing or creating tokens that were never deposited.
- Price manipulation. An attacker briefly distorts the price feed an app relies on, then borrows or withdraws more than they should.
Rug pulls and governance attacks make up the rest.
What This Means For Your Money
Most people will never be the direct target of a multimillion-dollar hack. But the money you keep on an exchange or in a crypto app sits in pools that attackers do target. A few habits lower your risk:
- Keep only what you trade on an exchange. Long-term holdings are safer in a wallet you control. Our ranking of the best crypto wallets covers hardware and software options, and not your keys, not your coins explains the tradeoff.
- Favor exchanges that publish proof of reserves and have covered past losses. Our exchange ratings weigh each one's security record.
- Use a hardware wallet or a multisig wallet for larger amounts, so one stolen key can't empty the account.
- Check the website before you approve anything. Bookmark the apps you use instead of clicking links, and revoke old token approvals you no longer need.
- Assume no insurance. Crypto held on an exchange is not FDIC insured, and exchange "insurance funds" are company promises, not guarantees.
If Your Exchange Gets Hacked
- Don't send more funds to the platform, and don't trust "recovery" offers that ask for payment or your seed phrase.
- Save screenshots of your balances and transaction history.
- Watch the exchange's official status page and verified social accounts for repayment plans.
- If withdrawals stay frozen, file a complaint with regulators and report theft to the FBI's IC3.
- Keep records for taxes. Losses from theft may be treated differently from investment losses, so talk to a tax professional.
How We Track Hacks
Our collector pulls the full incident list from DefiLlama's public hacks database every day, so new incidents appear within about 24 hours of being reported. Incident data comes from DefiLlama.
On top of that, Cult of Money researches the customer outcome for the largest incidents and every exchange or wallet hack of $5 million or more. Those outcomes come from the victim's own statements, law enforcement releases and reputable reporting, and they're linked in each row. When an exchange covers losses from its own funds, we record that separately from money actually recovered from the attacker.
We update a hack's status when repayment is confirmed. If you see an error, contact us.
FAQ
What Is The Biggest Crypto Hack Ever?
The largest crypto hack on record is Binance's $6.36 billion theft on Oct. 29, 2026. It's followed by LuBian ($3.5 billion in 2020) and Bybit ($1.5 billion in 2025). The table above is sorted by dollar amount at the time of the theft, so the order can differ from rankings that use today's prices.
Who Is Behind Most Large Crypto Hacks?
US law enforcement has attributed several of the largest thefts, including Bybit and Ronin, to North Korean groups. Many smaller incidents remain unattributed. We list attribution only when a law enforcement agency, the victim or a named investigator has made it, and we name the source.
Do Exchanges Reimburse Customers After A Hack?
Often, but not always. In our tracking, 37 of 58 major exchange hacks ended with customers made whole, while the rest ended in partial repayment, losses or are still pending. Larger exchanges are more likely to cover losses quickly.
Is My Crypto Insured On An Exchange?
Generally no. FDIC insurance covers bank deposits, not crypto, and SIPC covers securities at brokerages, not crypto held on an exchange. Some exchanges hold private insurance or reserve funds, but coverage is limited and not guaranteed.
Are DeFi Apps Safer Than Exchanges?
Not necessarily. DeFi apps avoid the risk of one company holding your keys, but they add the risk of smart contract bugs, and losses there are rarely reimbursed. The safest approach for most people is a mix: a reputable exchange for buying and a wallet you control for holding.
Sources (3)
- DefiLlama hacks database: https://defillama.com/hacks
- FBI IC3 public service announcement on the Bybit theft: https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250226
- Per-incident sources are listed in
content/data/hacks-overlay.jsonand shown in each table row.
