Data

Crypto Hacks Tracker: Every Major Theft And Whether Customers Got Paid Back

By Cult of Money StaffUpdated Nov 10, 2026 · 5 min read
Advertiser disclosure: we may earn a commission from partners on this page. It never changes how we score or rank. Any investing information provided on this page is for educational purposes only. Investing in cryptocurrency and crypto assets is high risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. How we make money.

Crypto gets stolen more often than most people realize. This tracker lists every reported hack and exploit we can find, updated daily, and adds the part that matters for your money: when an exchange, wallet or app was hacked, did its customers get paid back?

Lost This Year$8.78 billionvs. $2.72 billion in 2025
Incidents This Year340148 in 2025
Largest This Year$6.36 billionBinance, Oct. 29
Lost All Time$27.8 billion1,347 incidents since 2011

The Biggest Crypto Hacks

DateVictimTypeAmountHow It HappenedAttackerCustomers Made Whole
Oct. 29, 2026BinanceCentralized exchange$6.36BBinance pledged to cover all losses from its SAFU fund and company funds. It said about 95% was covered as of Nov 1, 2026, and reopened withdrawals in phases from Nov 1. Most assets were back by Nov 8, 2026, with INJ, XPL, NEAR and LTC still awaiting security checks.
Sources: fbi.gov, insurancejournal.com, thenationalnews.com, ambcrypto.com
North Korea's TraderTraitor group (attributed by the FBI, Oct 31, 2026; also TRM Labs)Pending
Dec. 28, 2020LuBianMining pool$3.5BLuBian never publicly disclosed the theft or announced any repayment, and it disappeared in early 2021 after pleading on-chain for the coins' return.
Sources: elliptic.co, info.arkm.com, cointelegraph.com
Unknown (disputed; Arkham and Elliptic trace the coins to wallets the US DOJ says Prince Group chairman Chen Zhi controlled)No
Feb. 21, 2025BybitCentralized exchange$1.5BBybit kept customer withdrawals open and replaced the roughly 400,000 stolen ETH within about 72 hours using its own funds and emergency liquidity from firms including Galaxy Digital, FalconX and Wintermute.
Sources: ic3.gov, cnbc.com, bleepingcomputer.com
Lazarus Group / TraderTraitor (attributed by FBI)Yes
$42.9M recovered from the attacker
March 23, 2022Ronin Network (Sky Mavis / Axie Infinity)Cross-chain bridge$624MSky Mavis reimbursed affected users with its own funds and new venture money before reopening the bridge in June 2022.
Sources: bloomberg.com, washingtonpost.com, cnbc.com
Lazarus Group (attributed by FBI)Yes
$30M recovered from the attacker
Aug. 10, 2021Poly NetworkCross-chain bridge$611MThe attacker returned essentially all of the funds within about 15 days, and Poly Network restored users' assets.
Sources: cnbc.com, theguardian.com, blog.chainalysis.com
Unknown (self-described white hat)Yes
$610M recovered from the attacker
Oct. 6, 2022BNB Chain Token Hub (Binance)Cross-chain bridge$570MNo user deposits were taken because the 2 million BNB was created from nothing, and validators halted the chain so the attacker could move only about $127M off it.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownNot applicable
Jan. 26, 2018CoincheckCentralized exchange$534MCoincheck repaid all of the roughly 260,000 affected customers in Japanese yen from its own capital.
Sources: bloomberg.com, reuters.com
Unknown (Japanese prosecutors later charged dozens of people for trading the stolen NEM)Yes
Feb. 7, 2014Mt. GoxCentralized exchange$470MAfter a decade-long Japanese rehabilitation process, creditors began receiving partial repayment in BTC, BCH and yen in 2024 from the roughly 142,000 BTC the trustee still held.
Sources: bloomberg.com, reuters.com
Alexey Bilyuchenko and Aleksandr Verner (charged by US DOJ in 2023); Alexander Vinnik accused of laundering the coinsPartial
Nov. 12, 2022FTXCentralized exchange$450MThe theft became part of the FTX bankruptcy, which repaid customers in cash at November 2022 prices plus interest rather than returning the crypto they held.
Sources: reuters.com, bloomberg.com
Robert Powell, Carter Rohn and Emily Hernandez (charged by US DOJ in a SIM-swap case)Partial
Sept. 24, 2026BitgetCentralized exchange$387MBitget said customer balances were not affected and the loss fell within its User Protection Fund, and it resumed withdrawals in phases starting Sept. 28.
Sources: bitget.com, forklog.com, decrypt.co
Unknown (Bitget's CEO said early signs matched North Korean groups; no formal attribution)Yes
Feb. 2, 2022Wormhole (Portal bridge)Cross-chain bridge$326MJump Crypto, Wormhole's backer, replaced the 120,000 ETH within about a day so wrapped ETH holders lost nothing.
Sources: rekt.news, arstechnica.com
UnknownYes
Sept. 6, 2026Liquid Network (Blockstream / Liquid Federation)Blockchain network$320MThe attackers returned about 3,400 of roughly 4,000 BTC. By Nov. 2, 2026, Liquid's federation reserves matched the L-BTC in circulation (about 4,269 BTC each), according to Liquid's public reserves data, closing the roughly 600 BTC gap seen in mid-October. Our sources don't say how the remaining gap was covered.
Sources: trmlabs.com, decrypt.co, cryptoslate.com, liquid.network
Unknown (self-described white hats)Yes
$272M recovered from the attacker
May 31, 2024DMM BitcoinCentralized exchange$305MDMM group companies supplied the money to back all customer bitcoin, and customer accounts were moved to SBI VC Trade before DMM Bitcoin closed.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org, 2021-2025.state.gov
TraderTraitor / Lazarus Group (attributed by FBI, DC3 and Japan's National Police Agency)Yes
April 1, 2026Drift ProtocolDeFi protocol$295MUsers received recovery tokens worth $1 per dollar lost, redeemable from a pool funded by Drift revenue, up to $127.5M from Tether and up to $20M from partners, so full repayment depends on that pool growing.
Sources: drift.trade, theblock.co, cointelegraph.com
DPRK-affiliated actor (attributed by Mandiant, per Drift)Partial
April 18, 2026Kelp DAO (rsETH)DeFi protocol$293MAn Aave-led industry fund called DeFi United raised over $300M in ETH and, with ETH frozen on Arbitrum, refilled the stolen rsETH so holders could redeem again.
Sources: theblock.co, coindesk.com, crowdfundinsider.com
Lazarus Group (suspected by LayerZero and on-chain investigators; Aave has called the link unproven in court)Yes
$71M recovered from the attacker
Feb. 9, 2024PlayDappGaming project$290MNo user deposits were drained, but the unauthorized minting diluted PLA holders and PlayDapp moved to a replacement token based on a pre-exploit snapshot.
Sources: theblock.co, elliptic.co, web3isgoinggreat.com
Unknown (private key compromise suspected by PeckShield and Elliptic)Not applicable
Sept. 29, 2020KuCoinCentralized exchange$281MKuCoin said no user funds were lost because about 84% was recovered with partners and law enforcement and the company and its insurance fund covered the rest.
Sources: bbc.com, reuters.com, reuters.com
Lazarus Group (attributed by Chainalysis and a UN expert panel)Yes
$235M recovered from the attacker
April 21, 2018Gate.ioCentralized exchange$235MGate never disclosed the theft and appears to have absorbed the loss, with no reports of customer balances being cut.
Sources: investing.com, oodaloop.com
North Korean hackers (attributed by on-chain investigator ZachXBT)Yes
July 18, 2024WazirXCentralized exchange$235MUnder a Singapore court-approved restructuring, users got back about 85% of their balances in October 2025, with the rest in non-tradable recovery tokens.
Sources: coindesk.com, therecord.media, 2021-2025.state.gov
Lazarus Group (attributed by blockchain analysts and a US-Japan-South Korea joint statement)Partial
May 22, 2025CetusDeFi protocol$223MSui validators froze about $162M, and after a community vote Cetus used those funds plus its treasury and a Sui Foundation loan to repay liquidity providers.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownYes
$162M recovered from the attacker
Sept. 23, 2023Mixin NetworkBlockchain network$200MMixin said it would repay 50% of losses in USDT and issue debt tokens for the rest, to be bought back from future profits.
Sources: reuters.com, theregister.com, rekt.news
UnknownPartial
March 13, 2023Euler FinanceDeFi protocol$197MThe attacker returned the stolen funds within about three weeks, and Euler distributed them back to depositors.
Sources: rekt.news
Unknown (attacker returned funds)Yes
$240M recovered from the attacker
Dec. 4, 2021BitMartCentralized exchange$196MBitMart pledged to cover losses from its own funds, but CNBC reported in January 2022 that some victims were still waiting to be repaid.
Sources: rekt.news, cnbc.com
UnknownPartial
Aug. 1, 2022NomadCross-chain bridge$190MWhite hats and some exploiters returned roughly $37M, which Nomad paid back to users pro rata, so most users recovered only a fraction.
Sources: rekt.news
Hundreds of copycat exploiters (largely unidentified)Partial
$37M recovered from the attacker
April 17, 2022BeanstalkDeFi protocol$181MBeanstalk relaunched in August 2022 and gave depositors Unripe Bean and Unripe LP tokens that are paid down gradually from new protocol activity, not in cash.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownPartial
Feb. 12, 2018BitGrailCentralized exchange$170MA Florence court declared BitGrail bankrupt in 2019 and seized about $1 million of Firano's personal assets for creditors, far short of the losses.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org, techcrunch.com, decrypt.co
Unknown (an Italian court held owner Francesco Firano liable, and Italian postal police later accused him of fraudulent bankruptcy)Partial
Sept. 20, 2022WintermuteMarket maker$160MWintermute absorbed the loss from its own equity and said its CeFi and OTC operations were not affected.
Sources: rekt.news, forbes.com
UnknownNot applicable
Nov. 9, 2017Parity Technologies (multisig wallet library)Software wallet$150MThe ETH remains permanently locked because the EIP-999 proposal to restore the wallet library was withdrawn.
Sources: github.com, eips.ethereum.org
devops199 (accidental, per the user's own GitHub report to Parity)No
Sept. 29, 2021CompoundDeFi protocol$147MNo user deposits were lost because the bug paid out extra COMP from the protocol's reward reserve, and founder Robert Leshner asked recipients to return it.
Sources: rekt.news
No attacker (a code bug in Proposal 62 overpaid COMP rewards, which Compound acknowledged)Not applicable
Dec. 13, 2021Vulcan ForgedGaming project$140MVulcan Forged reimbursed the 96 affected wallets from its treasury.
Sources: rekt.news, vice.com
UnknownYes
Oct. 30, 2021BXHDeFi protocol$139MNo full repayment to BXH users has been confirmed.
Sources: forkast.news, halborn.com, kr-asia.com
Unknown (BXH blamed a leaked admin private key)No
Oct. 27, 2021CREAM FinanceDeFi protocol$130MNo repayment to depositors has been confirmed, and CREAM's offer of a 10% bounty for returning the funds produced no reported return.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownNo
Nov. 3, 2025BalancerDeFi protocol$128MAbout $28 million rescued by whitehats, Balancer and StakeWise is being returned pro rata to liquidity providers in the affected pools, and the rest is lost.
Sources: decrypt.co, dlnews.com
UnknownPartial
$28M recovered from the attacker
Nov. 10, 2023PoloniexCentralized exchange$126MOwner Justin Sun pledged that Poloniex would fully reimburse the stolen funds from company resources.
Sources: rekt.news
Unknown (Lazarus Group suspected by on-chain analysts, not confirmed)Yes
July 7, 2023MultichainCross-chain bridge$126MMultichain shut down days later and bridge users were not repaid.
Sources: rekt.news
Unknown (Multichain said its CEO, detained by Chinese police since May 2023, held the signing keys)No
Aug. 30, 2026TectonicDeFi protocol$124MA Cronos chain rollback restored about $111.2 million in balances, but about $9.19 million left the chain first and no repayment plan for that shortfall has been announced.
Sources: theblock.co, rekt.news, cointelegraph.com
UnknownPartial
$111M recovered from the attacker
Dec. 2, 2021BadgerDAODeFi protocol$120MBadger's DAO approved a remediation plan that repaid affected users over time in vault tokens, not a single full cash refund.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownPartial
July 31, 2026Coldcard (Coinkite)Hardware wallet$116MCoinkite shipped patched firmware, but no compensation for drained users has been reported and seeds made on affected firmware must be replaced.
Sources: trmlabs.com, bleepingcomputer.com, rekt.news
Unknown (TRM Labs says multiple attackers may be involved)No
Oct. 11, 2022Mango MarketsDeFi protocol$115MEisenberg returned about $67 million after a DAO vote, and Mango used it with treasury funds to repay depositors.
Sources: rekt.news
Avraham Eisenberg (convicted by a jury in 2024, US DOJ; a judge later vacated the convictions)Yes
$67M recovered from the attacker
June 5, 2022Elrond (Maiar DEX), now MultiversXDeFi protocol$113MElrond said it recovered about 95% of the funds, burned the unbacked WEGLD and reopened the Maiar DEX two days later.
Sources: romania-insider.com, cryptoslate.com
UnknownYes
April 20, 2025BitgetCentralized exchange$100MBitget rolled back the irregular trades and offered compensation from its protection fund to users who lost money in the window.
Sources: theblock.co, rekt.news
Traders exploiting a malfunctioning market-making bot (Bitget said so and froze suspected accounts)Yes
June 3, 2023Atomic WalletSoftware wallet$100MAtomic Wallet did not reimburse users and said fewer than 1% of its monthly users were affected.
Sources: elliptic.co, rekt.news, fbi.gov
Lazarus Group (attributed by Elliptic, with the FBI later linking the funds to North Korea)No
$1M recovered from the attacker
June 23, 2022Harmony (Horizon Bridge)Cross-chain bridge$100MHarmony dropped a plan to mint new ONE tokens for victims and proposed a treasury-funded recovery, but no full repayment has been confirmed.
Sources: fbi.gov, theblock.co, rekt.news
Lazarus Group (attributed by FBI)No
May 18, 2021Venus ProtocolDeFi protocol$100MVenus was left with about $100 million in bad debt, which it worked down over time rather than repaying lenders at once.
Sources: theblock.co, thedefiant.io
Unknown (unidentified trader suspected of pumping XVS)Partial
Aug. 19, 2021LiquidCentralized exchange$91.3MLiquid covered the losses and took about $120 million in debt financing from FTX to keep customer balances whole.
Sources: cnbc.com
UnknownYes
Oct. 8, 2021Mirror ProtocolDeFi protocol$90MThe loss went unnoticed for seven months and no compensation was offered before Terra collapsed.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownNo
Nov. 22, 2023HECO Chain bridge (HTX)Cross-chain bridge$86.6MHTX pledged to fully cover losses from its same-day hot wallet hack, but compensation for HECO bridge users is not confirmed.
Sources: rekt.news
Unknown (rekt.news said it bore the hallmarks of Lazarus Group, not confirmed)Partial
Oct. 9, 2026Ledger devices sold by reseller CryptoBilisHardware wallet$86MLedger told owners to move funds to a new device with a new recovery phrase, and no compensation from Ledger or the reseller has been reported.
Amount is a floor: The Block and Decrypt report more than $86 million, unverified by Ledger.
Sources: theblock.co, decrypt.co
UnknownNo
Jan. 23, 2025PhemexCentralized exchange$85MPhemex said only hot wallets were hit and promised to compensate affected users. We found no confirmation that all losses were covered.
Sources: rekt.news, halborn.com, bleepingcomputer.com
Lazarus Group (suspected by on-chain investigators, not officially confirmed)Pending
June 18, 2025NobitexCentralized exchange$82MNobitex pledged to cover users from its insurance fund and reserves and reopened withdrawals in phases, but no completed compensation has been confirmed.
Sources: reuters.com, invezz.com
Predatory Sparrow / Gonjeshke Darande (claimed responsibility)Pending
Dec. 31, 2023Orbit Bridge (Orbit Chain)Cross-chain bridge$81.7MThe bridge was shut down and holders of tokens backed by the drained vault were left without a repayment plan.
Sources: rekt.news
Lazarus Group (suspected by on-chain investigators, not officially confirmed)No
May 1, 2022Rari Capital (Fei Protocol / Tribe DAO)DeFi protocol$80MTribe DAO first voted to reimburse affected users, then reversed that decision in late 2022 and wound down.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownNo
Jan. 28, 2022Qubit FinanceDeFi protocol$80MThe attacker kept the funds despite a bounty offer and lenders on the platform were not repaid.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownNo
Dec. 11, 2021AscendEXCentralized exchange$77MAscendEX promised full reimbursement from company funds and later reopened withdrawals.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownYes
June 21, 2021StakeHoundDeFi protocol$72MStakeHound said the ETH was permanently inaccessible and pursued a lawsuit against Fireblocks instead of repaying token holders.
Sources: theblock.co, coindesk.com
None (keys were lost, not stolen; StakeHound blamed custodian Fireblocks, which denies responsibility)No
Aug. 2, 2016BitfinexCentralized exchange$72MBitfinex cut every account by 36% and issued BFX IOU tokens, which it redeemed in full or converted into iFinex shares by April 2017, and the DOJ seized about 94,000 of the stolen BTC in February 2022.
Sources: reuters.com, justice.gov, washingtonpost.com
Ilya Lichtenstein (pleaded guilty, US DOJ)Yes
$3.6B recovered from the attacker
April 1, 2025UPCXPayment processor$70MThe drained tokens came from the project's own management accounts rather than user balances.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, cryptoslate.com
Unknown (flagged by security firm Cyvers)Not applicable
Dec. 8, 2017NiceHashMining pool$64MNiceHash repaid the stolen bitcoin to users in monthly installments from its own profits over about three years.
Sources: nicehash.com, justice.gov
North Korean military hackers / Lazarus Group (attributed by US DOJ indictment, February 2021)Yes
March 26, 2024MunchablesGaming project$62.5MThe developer returned roughly $60.5M in ETH within a day, and the funds were secured in a multisig before being returned to users.
Sources: rekt.news
Rogue developer hired by the team (identified by ZachXBT; North Korea link suspected, unconfirmed)Yes
$60.5M recovered from the attacker
July 30, 2023Curve FinanceDeFi protocol$61.7MWhite-hat bots and some of the attackers returned a large share of the funds, but not every affected pool was fully repaid.
Sources: rekt.news
Unknown (some exploiters and white-hat bots returned funds)Partial
July 26, 2023AlphaPoPayment processor$60MThe drained hot wallets belonged to the payment processor and its merchants, and AlphaPo never publicly detailed any losses to end users.
Sources: theblock.co, decrypt.co, rekt.news
Lazarus Group (attributed by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, not confirmed by law enforcement)Not applicable
Sept. 14, 2018Zaif (Tech Bureau)Centralized exchange$60MFisco invested 5 billion yen and took over the exchange, repaying BTC and BCH in kind and MonaCoin at a fixed rate, 60% in coin and 40% in yen.
Sources: crowdfundinsider.com, cryptoglobe.com, cointelegraph.com
UnknownYes
Sept. 12, 2023CoinExCentralized exchange$55MCoinEx said the losses were a small part of its assets and covered them from company funds.
Sources: rekt.news
Lazarus Group (linked by on-chain investigators through address overlap with the FBI-attributed Stake.com hack)Yes
June 22, 2024BtcTurkCentralized exchange$54MBtcTurk said cold wallets were safe and it absorbed the hot wallet losses from its own funds.
Sources: cryptoslate.com
UnknownYes
Nov. 27, 2019UpbitCentralized exchange$49.3MUpbit covered the full loss from its own funds and moved remaining hot wallet assets to cold storage.
Sources: zdnet.com, ytn.co.kr
Lazarus Group and Andariel (attributed by South Korea's National Police Agency, November 2024)Yes
Aug. 14, 2025BtcTurkCentralized exchange$48MBtcTurk said user assets would not be affected because cold wallets were untouched and the company would absorb the hot wallet loss.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, decrypt.co, cryptoslate.com
UnknownYes
July 19, 2025CoinDCXCentralized exchange$44.2MThe stolen funds came from the exchange's own operational wallet, and CoinDCX covered the loss from its treasury with no customer balances touched.
Sources: decrypt.co, theblock.co
Unknown hackers who planted malware through a fake job offer (Bengaluru police arrested employee Rahul Agarwal, whose credentials were used)Not applicable
Sept. 20, 2024BingXCentralized exchange$43.3MBingX said most funds were in cold storage and that it would cover the hot wallet losses from its own reserves.
Sources: rekt.news
Lazarus Group (suspected by blockchain security firm Cyvers, unconfirmed)Yes
Sept. 9, 2025SwissBorgCentralized exchange$41.5MSwissBorg said it would cover any shortfall for affected users from its own SOL treasury.
Sources: rekt.news, protos.com, halborn.com
Unknown (gained access through staking partner Kiln's compromised API)Yes
Nov. 2, 2026Mercado BitcoinCentralized exchange$40MProtocol Logic (DefiLlama classification). Customer outcome not yet researched.
Sources: defillama.com
Not yet reviewedUnder review
May 7, 2019BinanceCentralized exchange$40MBinance covered the full loss from its SAFU emergency fund and resumed trading after about a week.
Sources: cnbc.com, techcrunch.com, techcrunch.com
UnknownYes
March 25, 2019CoinBeneCentralized exchange$40MCoinBene called the outflows maintenance and denied a hack, and no repayment plan was ever announced.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, elementus.io
UnknownNo
June 10, 2018CoinrailCentralized exchange$37.2MToken issuers froze or burned roughly two-thirds of the stolen coins, but Coinrail did not announce a general payout for the rest.
Sources: bleepingcomputer.com, techcrunch.com, medium.com
UnknownPartial
Nov. 26, 2025UpbitCentralized exchange$36MUpbit operator Dunamu said it would cover all customer losses from its own reserves.
Sources: decrypt.co, cointelegraph.com
Lazarus Group (suspected by South Korean authorities, per Yonhap; not confirmed)Yes
Feb. 12, 2022IRA Financial Trust (accounts held at Gemini)Custodian$36MIRA Financial said it would use proceeds from its lawsuit against Gemini to reimburse customers, and the case settled in July 2024 on undisclosed terms.
Sources: decrypt.co, cointelegraph.com
UnknownPending
Jan. 18, 2022Crypto.comCentralized exchange$33.7MCrypto.com said it reimbursed all 483 affected users in full after unauthorized withdrawals bypassed two-factor authentication.
Sources: rekt.news, fortune.com
UnknownYes
June 21, 2018BithumbCentralized exchange$31MBithumb said it would make up the lost coins with the exchange's own holdings.
Sources: koreatimes.co.kr, hacked.slowmist.io
UnknownYes
July 1, 2017Parity multisig wallet (Swarm City, Edgeless Casino and Aeternity wallets)Software wallet$30MThe stolen ETH sat in project token-sale wallets rather than retail accounts and was not returned, while white hat hackers moved about 377,000 ETH from other vulnerable wallets to safety and returned it.
Sources: coindesk.com
UnknownNot applicable
Nov. 1, 2022DeribitCentralized exchange$28MDeribit covered the loss from company reserves and said client balances held in cold storage were not affected.
Sources: rekt.news, hacked.slowmist.io
UnknownYes
July 12, 2019BitPoint JapanCentralized exchange$27.6MBitPoint and its parent Remixpoint repaid customers' lost crypto before reopening the exchange.
Sources: hacked.slowmist.io
UnknownYes
July 16, 2025BigONECentralized exchange$27MBigONE pledged full compensation from its internal reserves plus outside borrowing for some tokens.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownYes
Feb. 20, 2019CoinbinCentralized exchange$26MCoinbin filed for bankruptcy after the embezzlement and no full repayment to customers was reported.
Sources: hacked.slowmist.io
Coinbin employee, a former Youbit executive (alleged by the company)No
Sept. 10, 2024IndodaxCentralized exchange$25.2MIndodax said user crypto and rupiah balances were fully safe and the company absorbed the loss.
Sources: rekt.news, fxstreet.com
Lazarus Group (suspected by security firm Cyvers; unconfirmed)Yes
April 14, 2023BitrueCentralized exchange$23MBitrue said all identified affected users would be compensated in full and the drained wallet held under 5% of its reserves.
Sources: coindesk.com, hacked.slowmist.io
UnknownYes
June 4, 2024LykkeCentralized exchange$22.4MLykke halted trading and announced a voluntary compensation scheme, but full repayment has not been confirmed.
Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com, hacked.slowmist.io
Lazarus Group (suspected by on-chain investigators; unconfirmed)Pending
Aug. 29, 2021BilaxyCentralized exchange$21.7MBilaxy confirmed its hot wallet was hacked, and no record of customer repayment was found.
Sources: hacked.slowmist.io
UnknownPending
Nov. 16, 2024DEXXTrading tool$21MDEXX asked the hacker to return the funds and said compensation would depend on what it could recover, with no completed repayment reported.
Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com
UnknownPending
Dec. 11, 20223CommasTrading tool$20M3Commas did not repay users, though FTX announced a one-time $6M payment for its own customers hit through leaked 3Commas keys shortly before FTX collapsed.
Sources: blockworks.co, forklog.com
UnknownNo
March 29, 2019BithumbCentralized exchange$19MBithumb said the stolen coins were company funds and customer assets in cold storage were not affected.
Sources: hacked.slowmist.io, en.wikipedia.org
Suspected insiders (per Bithumb)Not applicable
Oct. 21, 2026CoinDCXCentralized exchange$16MCoinDCX said it credited all affected user deposits and absorbed the roughly $16M as an operational loss.
Sources: protos.com, onebullex.com, cryptobriefing.com
UnknownYes
Jan. 14, 2019CryptopiaCentralized exchange$16MCryptopia went into liquidation, and liquidators began returning remaining BTC and DOGE to over 10,000 verified account holders in December 2024, with many receiving about 85% to 90% of their 2019 holdings.
Sources: rnz.co.nz, en.wikipedia.org
UnknownPartial
June 11, 2023Floating Point Group (FPG)Custodian$15MFPG froze third-party accounts and halted trading, deposits and withdrawals, and no customer repayment was reported.
Sources: coindesk.com, theblock.co
UnknownPending
April 29, 2024RainCentralized exchange$14.8MRain said customer funds were safe and its parent Rain Group covered the losses.
Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com, hacked.slowmist.io
North Korean state-sponsored hackers (attributed by the company)Yes
July 24, 2025WOO XCentralized exchange$14MWOO X compensated the nine affected users in full from its treasury.
Sources: woox.io, cryptoslate.com
UNC4899, linked to Lazarus Group (attributed by the company's investigation)Yes
April 8, 2023GDACCentralized exchange$13.9MGDAC halted deposits and withdrawals and reported the theft to South Korean police, and no customer repayment plan was confirmed.
Sources: web3isgoinggreat.com, hacked.slowmist.io
UnknownPending
April 16, 2026GrinexCentralized exchange$13.7MGrinex suspended operations after the theft and no repayment to users was reported.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, thehackernews.com
Unknown (Grinex blamed Western intelligence agencies without evidence)No
Oct. 31, 2024M2Centralized exchange$13.7MM2 said it took full responsibility for the losses and restored customer funds the same day.
Sources: cointelegraph.com
UnknownYes
Nov. 22, 2023HTX (formerly Huobi)Centralized exchange$13.6MJustin Sun said HTX would fully compensate the hot wallet losses, and services resumed within days.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, cointelegraph.com, theblock.co
UnknownYes
Aug. 5, 2026KITE Foundation (Kite AI)Other$13.3MThe foundation froze transfers and migrated legitimate balances 1:1 to a new token contract from a pre-incident snapshot, excluding attacker addresses, and said no users lost assets.
Sources: chaincatcher.com, techflowpost.com
UnknownNot applicable
Sept. 7, 2023Fortress TrustCustodian$12MFortress covered most affected accounts and Ripple paid the rest within about a week as part of a planned acquisition it later dropped.
Sources: fortune.com, theblock.co, coindesk-coindesk-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com
UnknownYes
May 8, 2025BitoProCentralized exchange$11.5MBitoPro said no user funds were affected and absorbed the loss itself, though it only acknowledged the hack 25 days later after ZachXBT flagged it.
Sources: theblock.co
Lazarus Group (attributed by the company)Yes
Dec. 21, 2020EXMOCentralized exchange$10.5MEXMO said only its hot wallets were hit, about 5% of total assets, and promised to cover any user losses in full.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, cointelegraph.com, theblock.co
UnknownYes
June 2, 2019KrakenCentralized exchange$10.4MAccess Control: Improper Access Control (DefiLlama classification). Customer outcome not yet researched.
Sources: defillama.com
Not yet reviewedUnder review
July 29, 2014CryptsyCentralized exchange$9.58MCryptsy collapsed in 2016, and victims got only small payouts from class-action settlements, including about $962,500 from Coinbase.
Sources: theblock.co, cointelegraph.com
Paul Vernon, Cryptsy founder (alleged by court-appointed receiver and class-action plaintiffs)Partial
June 6, 2019GateHubWallet provider$9.5MGateHub said it found no fault on its side and told affected users to move funds, and no reimbursement was announced.
Sources: gatehub.net, theblock.co, cointelegraph.com
UnknownNo
Feb. 27, 2023MyAlgoSoftware wallet$9.2MMyAlgo did not announce any reimbursement and told users to move funds out.
Sources: cointelegraph.com
UnknownNo
Aug. 17, 2019CoinTigerCentralized exchange$9.2MNo public record was found of CoinTiger repaying holders, and the dumped tokens crashed PTT's price.UnknownNo
June 19, 2011Mt. GoxCentralized exchange$8.75MMt. Gox rolled back trades made after the fraudulent sell order and restored balances before reopening.
Sources: theregister.co.uk, en.wikipedia.org
UnknownYes
Dec. 25, 2025Trust WalletSoftware wallet$8.5MTrust Wallet pledged to reimburse affected users and began reviewing claims in late December 2025. Its July 17, 2026 update said claim reviews were still ongoing case by case.
Sources: trustwallet.com, theblock.co
UnknownPending
Sept. 25, 2023HTX (formerly Huobi)Centralized exchange$8MHTX covered the loss itself, and the hacker returned the 5,000 ETH on October 7, 2023, in exchange for a 250 ETH bounty.
Sources: theblock.co, theblock.co
UnknownYes
$8M recovered from the attacker
Aug. 9, 2026CoinsbuyPayment processor$7.9MCoinsbuy said it covered all affected client funds from its own reserves and resumed normal service.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, decrypt.co
UnknownYes
July 10, 2021Anyswap (later Multichain)Cross-chain bridge$7.9MAnyswap said remedial action was in place for all exploited funds in its new V3 liquidity pools.
Sources: rekt.news
UnknownYes
Jan. 6, 2024CoinsPaidPayment processor$7.5MCoinsPaid did not comment publicly, and its clients are businesses such as merchants rather than individual savers.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, beincrypto.com
Lazarus Group (suspected by Cyvers, unconfirmed)Not applicable
Feb. 1, 2022BitbnsCentralized exchange$7.5MBitbns did not disclose the hack until 2023, and it is unclear whether user balances were fully honored.UnknownPartial
March 24, 2019DragonExCentralized exchange$7MDragonEx said it recovered part of the funds and would take responsibility for user losses, but later limited withdrawals through an internal quota token.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, theblock.co, cointelegraph.com
Lazarus Group (attributed by on-chain investigators such as Chainalysis)Partial
Aug. 18, 2020OKEx (now OKX)Centralized exchange$5.6MThe double-spend hit OKEx's own funds, and no customer losses were reported.
Sources: cointelegraph.com, en.wikipedia.org
UnknownNot applicable
Sept. 8, 2020EterbaseCentralized exchange$5.4MEterbase said it was taking steps to protect client deposits, but no repayment plan was found.
Sources: theblock.co, cointelegraph.com
UnknownNo
Jan. 5, 2015BitstampCentralized exchange$5.2MBitstamp covered the loss from its reserves, most of which were in cold storage, and honored all customer balances when it reopened on January 9, 2015.
Sources: fortune.com, cointelegraph.com, zdnet.com
UnknownYes
Sept. 24, 2026Magic Eden users (Limit Break Payment Processor)Other$1.8MAn attacker abused old token and NFT approvals to Limit Break's Payment Processor contract, used by Magic Eden's retired Ethereum-network marketplace. Whitehats moved another 23,155 exposed NFTs, worth over $5.7 million, to safe custody. Magic Eden said live listings weren't affected.
Amount is DefiLlama's estimate. 660 WETH alone was worth about $1.77 million at the Sept. 24, 2026 price.
Sources: theblock.co, decrypt.co
UnknownNo
May 1, 2026BisqTrading tool$907KA modified client exploited missing validation of negative miner fees in the Bisq 1 trade protocol to pull value from trade deposits. Volunteers advanced about 10.99 BTC and affected users were reimbursed on June 5, 2026, after a DAO vote. Bisq 2 and Bisq Easy weren't affected.
Amount is 11.59104 BTC at the May 1, 2026 Coinbase close of $78,234. DefiLlama lists $550,000.
Sources: bisq.network, bisq.network
UnknownYes
Dec. 30, 2020GuardaSoftware walletNot disclosedAttackers took over Guarda's web domains through its domain registrar and sent users to a fake wallet download page. Guarda offered refunds scaled to each user's loss, paying in full only for losses up to $2,000.
No total loss was published. Source is ForkLog (secondary, quoting Guarda).
Sources: forklog.com
UnknownPartial

Amounts are the US dollar value at the time of the theft, as reported by the victim, law enforcement or blockchain investigators. When sources disagree, we use the figure the victim confirmed and note the range.

Did Customers Get Their Money Back?

For every hack of a centralized exchange or wallet app of $5 million or more, plus the 60 largest incidents of any kind, we checked what happened to the people whose money was there:

  • Yes: customers were made whole, either by the company covering the loss or through recovered funds.
  • Partial: customers got some money back, often years later or in a different form, like company tokens or bankruptcy payouts.
  • No: customers absorbed the loss.
  • Pending: the company has pledged to cover losses or the case is still open.
  • Not applicable: the funds belonged to a protocol or company treasury rather than customer accounts.

Did Customers Get Paid Back?

YesPartialNoPendingNot applicable

Centralized Exchanges61% Yes
DeFi And Bridges31% Yes

Centralized Exchanges: 61 hacks, 37 yes, 10 partial, 5 no, 6 pending, 3 not applicable. DeFi And Bridges: 29 hacks, 9 yes, 9 partial, 9 no, 2 not applicable. Wallets, custodians and other services (29 researched incidents) aren't shown. Source: Cult of Money research.

The pattern is clear. Large exchanges with large cash reserves usually cover customer losses, and they often say so within days. Smaller exchanges are more likely to freeze withdrawals, pay back partially or shut down. Mt. Gox customers waited about a decade for partial repayment, and FTX customers were repaid through bankruptcy rather than by the exchange itself.

A promise to cover losses is not the same as a payout. We mark a hack "yes" only once repayment has been confirmed by the company or by reporting, and we keep pledges marked "pending" until then.

How Crypto Gets Stolen

Share Of Dollars Lost

Stolen Keys33%
Front-End And Infrastructure Attacks27%
Social Engineering11%
Smart Contract Bugs11%
Access Control Failures7%
Bridge Exploits6%
Price Manipulation4%
Rug Pulls1%
Governance Attacks<1%
Unclassified<1%

Share Of Incidents

Stolen Keys12%
Front-End And Infrastructure Attacks8%
Social Engineering5%
Smart Contract Bugs36%
Access Control Failures17%
Bridge Exploits4%
Price Manipulation13%
Rug Pulls3%
Governance Attacks2%
Unclassified<1%

1,347 incidents since 2011, worth $27.8 billion at the time of theft. Causes are grouped from DefiLlama's classifications. 60 incidents with no reported amount count toward incidents only. One incident, Binance's $6.36 billion theft on Oct. 29, 2026, is 23% of all dollars lost. DefiLlama files it under front-end and infrastructure attacks. Source: DefiLlama.

Stolen keys and front-end attacks account for most of the dollars lost, while bugs in smart contracts cause the most incidents. Here are the causes in plain English, from the most dollars lost to the least:

  • Stolen keys. Attackers get hold of the private keys or signing systems that control a hot wallet. This is the largest cause by dollars and includes the Coincheck theft in January 2018 and the Ronin Network theft in March 2022.
  • Front-end and infrastructure attacks. Attackers break into a company's servers, internal systems or website instead of its smart contracts. Sometimes a website or domain is hijacked, so users approve transactions that send their own funds to the attacker. This is the second-largest cause by dollars because DefiLlama files Binance's $6.36 billion theft in October 2026 here. Without that one theft, it would be one of the smaller causes.
  • Social engineering. Attackers trick employees or wallet signers into approving a transaction or handing over access. DefiLlama files the Bybit theft in February 2025 here, after signers approved a transaction that gave the attackers control of the wallet. We use the FBI's figure of $1.5 billion, as the table does, while the cause chart uses DefiLlama's $1.4 billion.
  • Bugs in smart contracts. Code that holds money does something its authors didn't intend. Attackers find the flaw and drain it, sometimes in minutes.
  • Access control failures. Someone gains admin powers they should not have, often through a compromised employee account or a badly configured contract.
  • Bridge exploits. Attackers fool the systems that move tokens between blockchains into releasing or creating tokens that were never deposited.
  • Price manipulation. An attacker briefly distorts the price feed an app relies on, then borrows or withdraws more than they should.

Rug pulls and governance attacks make up the rest.

What This Means For Your Money

Most people will never be the direct target of a multimillion-dollar hack. But the money you keep on an exchange or in a crypto app sits in pools that attackers do target. A few habits lower your risk:

  1. Keep only what you trade on an exchange. Long-term holdings are safer in a wallet you control. Our ranking of the best crypto wallets covers hardware and software options, and not your keys, not your coins explains the tradeoff.
  2. Favor exchanges that publish proof of reserves and have covered past losses. Our exchange ratings weigh each one's security record.
  3. Use a hardware wallet or a multisig wallet for larger amounts, so one stolen key can't empty the account.
  4. Check the website before you approve anything. Bookmark the apps you use instead of clicking links, and revoke old token approvals you no longer need.
  5. Assume no insurance. Crypto held on an exchange is not FDIC insured, and exchange "insurance funds" are company promises, not guarantees.

If Your Exchange Gets Hacked

  • Don't send more funds to the platform, and don't trust "recovery" offers that ask for payment or your seed phrase.
  • Save screenshots of your balances and transaction history.
  • Watch the exchange's official status page and verified social accounts for repayment plans.
  • If withdrawals stay frozen, file a complaint with regulators and report theft to the FBI's IC3.
  • Keep records for taxes. Losses from theft may be treated differently from investment losses, so talk to a tax professional.

How We Track Hacks

Our collector pulls the full incident list from DefiLlama's public hacks database every day, so new incidents appear within about 24 hours of being reported. Incident data comes from DefiLlama.

On top of that, Cult of Money researches the customer outcome for the largest incidents and every exchange or wallet hack of $5 million or more. Those outcomes come from the victim's own statements, law enforcement releases and reputable reporting, and they're linked in each row. When an exchange covers losses from its own funds, we record that separately from money actually recovered from the attacker.

We update a hack's status when repayment is confirmed. If you see an error, contact us.

FAQ

What Is The Biggest Crypto Hack Ever?

The largest crypto hack on record is Binance's $6.36 billion theft on Oct. 29, 2026. It's followed by LuBian ($3.5 billion in 2020) and Bybit ($1.5 billion in 2025). The table above is sorted by dollar amount at the time of the theft, so the order can differ from rankings that use today's prices.

Who Is Behind Most Large Crypto Hacks?

US law enforcement has attributed several of the largest thefts, including Bybit and Ronin, to North Korean groups. Many smaller incidents remain unattributed. We list attribution only when a law enforcement agency, the victim or a named investigator has made it, and we name the source.

Do Exchanges Reimburse Customers After A Hack?

Often, but not always. In our tracking, 37 of 58 major exchange hacks ended with customers made whole, while the rest ended in partial repayment, losses or are still pending. Larger exchanges are more likely to cover losses quickly.

Is My Crypto Insured On An Exchange?

Generally no. FDIC insurance covers bank deposits, not crypto, and SIPC covers securities at brokerages, not crypto held on an exchange. Some exchanges hold private insurance or reserve funds, but coverage is limited and not guaranteed.

Are DeFi Apps Safer Than Exchanges?

Not necessarily. DeFi apps avoid the risk of one company holding your keys, but they add the risk of smart contract bugs, and losses there are rarely reimbursed. The safest approach for most people is a mix: a reputable exchange for buying and a wallet you control for holding.

Sources (3)
  • DefiLlama hacks database: https://defillama.com/hacks
  • FBI IC3 public service announcement on the Bybit theft: https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250226
  • Per-incident sources are listed in content/data/hacks-overlay.json and shown in each table row.

Keep Reading